Faster top_n_sigma sampler (#1417)
* Faster top_n_sigma sampler * This is better: 4000 t/s -> 8000 t/s
This commit is contained in:
parent
7fab617684
commit
9f4656fa7d
|
|
@ -480,44 +480,37 @@ void llama_sample_top_n_sigma_impl(struct llama_sampling * smpl, llama_token_dat
|
|||
|
||||
const int64_t t_start_sample_us = ggml_time_us();
|
||||
|
||||
float max = candidates->data[0].logit;
|
||||
float mean = 0;
|
||||
size_t count = 0;
|
||||
double sum1 = 0, sum2 = 0;
|
||||
float max = 0;
|
||||
int count = 0;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < (int)candidates->size; ++i) {
|
||||
// Only count non-negative infinity values
|
||||
if (candidates->data[i].logit != -INFINITY) {
|
||||
max = std::max(max, candidates->data[i].logit);
|
||||
mean += candidates->data[i].logit;
|
||||
if (auto l = candidates->data[i].logit; l != -INFINITY) {
|
||||
max = std::max(max, l);
|
||||
++count;
|
||||
double dl = l;
|
||||
sum1 += dl;
|
||||
sum2 += dl*dl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (count < 4) {
|
||||
return; // again, tandard deviation is not well defined for so few logits (4 is actually pushing it)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mean /= count;
|
||||
double dmean = sum1/count;
|
||||
double dsigma2 = sum2/count - dmean*dmean;
|
||||
if (dsigma2 <= 0) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
float sigma = float(sqrt(dsigma2));
|
||||
|
||||
float sigma2 = 0;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < (int)candidates->size; ++i) {
|
||||
if (candidates->data[i].logit != -INFINITY) {
|
||||
float delta = candidates->data[i].logit - mean;
|
||||
sigma2 += delta*delta;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
float sigma = sqrtf(sigma2/count);
|
||||
float thresh = max - top_n_sigma*sigma;
|
||||
|
||||
int n_masked = 0;
|
||||
int n_use = 0;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < (int)candidates->size; ++i) {
|
||||
if (candidates->data[i].logit != -INFINITY && candidates->data[i].logit < thresh) {
|
||||
candidates->data[i].logit = -INFINITY;
|
||||
++n_masked;
|
||||
if (candidates->data[i].logit >= thresh) {
|
||||
candidates->data[n_use++] = candidates->data[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// do we really want to compute softmax unconditionally?
|
||||
// The following coresponds to mainline implementation with the minor optimization
|
||||
// that we only call the relativly expensive softmax if we masked away some tokens.
|
||||
if (n_masked > 0 || !candidates->sorted) {
|
||||
if (n_use < (int)candidates->size) {
|
||||
candidates->size = n_use;
|
||||
llama_sample_softmax_impl(nullptr, candidates);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue