* Slight MLA TG performance improvement on CUDA
The low MLA performance on CUDA is dues to
the wk_b * q_nope operation.
It turns into n_head matrix multiplications with
n_head separate quantization and GEMV steps.
The associated overhead is just too much for TG
where each GEMV is very fast (512 x 128 = 131 KFLOP
for DeepSeek-Lite, 4X that for DeepSeekV3/R1).
The way it was done there was also a copy of each q_nope
row before quantization, which I have now eliminated.
This results in a ~2.5% speedup.
What needs to happen instead is to launch a single
computation that quantizes all heads, and then have
a kernel that does the GEMV for all heads instead of
n_head sequential GEMVs.
* Slightly better
* CUDA: Quantize non-contiguous tensors
* Much better MLA
It is a total hack, but it works.
* Cleanup
Remove duplicated gemv's.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Give the user the option to override where model weights are stored
* Fix ggml_nbytes() problem and cleanup
For a tensor with zero elements ggml_nbytes() was returning
uint64_t::max, and this was causing graph allocation failure.
* Add timing info to CUDA graph evaluation
* Add more timing info
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Fusing MoE up * unary(gate)
* Fusing MoE up * unary(gate): CUDA
We get ~13% speedup for PP-512 and ~2% for TG-128
for DeepSeek-Lite
* On CUDA also fuse MoE down * (up * unary(gate))
in case the MUL_MAT_ID op for the down experts is the next
op in the graph.
* Command line option to enable fused MoE up*unary(gate)
* Add fmoe option to llama-bench
* Adding forgotten gelu, relu, silu on ARM
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding q8_KV - Basics + AVX2 gemm/gemv
* q8_KV: Better AVX2 gemm
* q8_KV: Better Zen4 gemm
We get 225.7 t/s for L3-8B. In comparison q8_0 without
run-tinme-repacking is at 169 t/s.
* q8_KV: AVX2 gemm/gemv
We get 254 t/s for L3-8B vs 194 t/s for q8_0 without rtr.
* q8_KV: be able to use it for K cache
This required quite a few fixes in ggml and llama.cpp:
* ggml: do not calculate row size as n/block_size*type_size. I had
removed most of it when implementing the quants with per row scale,
bit it was stull lurking in ggml_copy. Not sure if these were the last
remnants of ggmil-style row sizes, or if there are still places left
* llama.cpp: get rid of the the 1d K cache assumption. Create and manage
the K-cache as a 2D tensor so we can have per row meta data as needed
by q8_KV.
Using q8_KV for K-cache results in non-negligible performance gains.
More details to follow, but for DeepSeek-Lite with MLA, we get
18% speedup for PP-8192 compared to q8_0 K-cache.
* q8_KV: be able to use it for K cache in FA
* q8_KV: repack it for K*Q in FA
* q8_KV: slightly faster gemv on Zen4
* q8_KV: slightly faster gemv on Zen4
* q8_KV: ARM_NEON
We get PP-512 = 167 t/s for L3-8B without interleaving!
We do the interleaving on the fly, so I wonder if this
could be done for other quants as well.
* q8_KV: use it in FA on NEON
* q8_KV_r8 - repacked q8_KV
On Zen4 it is slower than q8_k_r8 (292 vs 370 t/s)
This makes no sense whatsoever as the q8_KV_r8 GEMM is
basically the q8_k_r8 GEMM with the unnecessary block stuff
removed (so, one would think that it would be faster).
* q8_KV_r8: don't use nrc_y = 16 on Zen4
This is faster - 350 t/s. Why?
Much better than the 290 t/s we had before, but still slower
than the 370 t/s for q8_k_r8.
* q8_KV: nrc_y = 16 also doesn't pay off in FA
* Minor
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Do not allocate / report caches that are not used
It is either the standard KV cache or MLA cache, not both.
* Rename X_pe to X_rope
Much easier to follow, at least for my brain, when we have
X_rope : rotational position encoding
X_nope : no position encoding
instead of X_pe and X_nope, where I was wondering wtf is 'pe'
and 'nope'.
* WIP
* WIP
* WIP
* WIP
* Warn user when disabling MLA
* MLA: compile time option to not use transposed KV cache
Cuts KV cache size in nearly half at the expense of slower
TG performance for long contexts (it becomes similar to
no-MLA).
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding support for K head size != V head size
This is relevant for DeepSeek models.
At this point ggml CPU FA works.
Now I need to go and change iqk FA to make it work
with Dk != Dv.
* iqk support for K head size != V head size
To not have compilation time explode, just
Dk = 192, Dv = 128 for now (DeepSeek)
* FA: very slightly faster for nq = 1 (TG)
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Load all MoE experts during warmup
Co-authored-by: Stanisław Szymczyk <sszymczy@gmail.com>
* Unify warmup to one token
---------
Co-authored-by: Stanisław Szymczyk <sszymczy@gmail.com>
* Deepseek MLA Optimizations
Co-authored-by: Stanisław Szymczyk <sszymczy@gmail.com>
* Make MLA optional
* Remove some unnecessary copies in the MLA attention
* Deepseek MLA Optimizations V2 (#195)
* Avoid allocating MHA KV cache when MLA is turned on
* Added missing gguf-py file
* Added final optimizations
Co-authored-by: Stanisław Szymczyk <sszymczy@gmail.com>
* Make sure we do have wk_b and wv_b before enabling MLA
---------
Co-authored-by: Stanisław Szymczyk <sszymczy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Use type_k and type_v to set the types of the MLA caches
They were hard-coded at f16.
On my Ryzen-7950X with native bf16 support I get a fairly
significant PP performance boost with bf16 KV-cache:
PP-4096 = 320 t/s up from 292 t/s with fp16 KV-cache.
* Better gemm strategy when nth > nhead
It gives a ~10% PP performance boost for DeepSeek-Lite with 32 threads
(with or without MLA).
Before this commit, when nth > nhead heads were processed
sequentially with all nth threads participating in each
matrix multiplication. Now we ind the gcd of nhead and
nth and split threads into nth/gcd groups, each group
processing nhead/gcd heads.
---------
Co-authored-by: Saood Karim <saood05@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Stanisław Szymczyk <sszymczy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Rename q4_0_r4 to q4_0_r8 to reflect actual row interleaving
* Rename q8_0_r4 to q8_0_r8 to reflect actual row interleaving
* Rename iq4_xs_r4 to iq4_xs_r8 to reflect actual row interleaving
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq1_m_r4: basics (quantize/dequantize)
* iq1_m_r4: Zen4 gemm
* iq1_m_r4: neon gemm
* iq1_m_r4: switch to q8_0_x4 also on AVX2/Zen4
With the deltas being per group of 8, we cannot make use
of the q8 sums stored in q8_1, so we get a tiny gain by
using q8_0_x4.
* iq1_m_r4: rename mul_mat_iq1_m_r4_q8_1 to mul_mat_iq1_m_r4_q8_0
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq1_s_r4: basics - quantize/dequantize
* iq1_s_r4: gemm/gemv works on AVX2/Zen4
* Don't forget to make sure we have a multiple of 4 rows per thread
* iq1_s_r4: this is better
* iq1_s_r4: fix Zen4 after AVX2 changes
* iq1_s_r4: NEON gemm/gemv
* iq1_s_r4: more bits for shared experts
With this mix we arrive at PPL(512) = 9.4140
for Deepseek-Lite using 1.766 bpw for the repeating layers.
On the Ryzen-7950X we get PP-512 = 494 t/s and
TG-128 = 52 t/s @ 16 threads.
* Forgotten counter increment
* iq1_s_r4: slightly faster AVX2/Zen4 gemm/gemv
* Compiler warnings
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Quantization mixes tweaks
* Make iq4_nl_r4 work with row size that are not a multiple of 128
... on Zen4
* Make iq4_nl_r4 work with row size that are not a multiple of 128
... on AVX2
* Make iq4_nl_r4 work with row size that are not a multiple of 128
... on AVX2
* Make q6_0_w4 work with row size that are not a multiple of 128
... on Zen4
* Make q6_0_w4 work with row size that are not a multiple of 128
... on Zen4
* Make q5_0_r4 work with row size that are not a multiple of 128
... on Zen4 and AVX2
* Make q5,6_0_r4, iq4_nl_e4 work with row size that are not a multiple of 128
also on NEON.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Try interleaving 8 rows for iq4_xs
On Zen4, PP-512 goes up from ~260 t/s to 288 t/s for L3-8B.
TG-128 reaches max. performance at 2 threads and is slightly
higher than 4 interleaved rows (14.48 t/s vs 13.11 t/s @ 2 threads
and 14/28 t/s @ 4 threads).
* Try interleaving 8 iq4_xs rows
It is also faster on AVX2.
This is the NEON implementation. It is tiny bit faster than
4 interleaved rows (~0.5%).
So, this looks like a winner given the Zen4/AVX2 improvement
without associated NEON egression.
* Cleanup
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (AVX2)
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (Zen4)
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (Zen4) - slightly better
PP-512 is now 284 t/s compared to 257 t/s for 4-rows interleaved.
TG-128 reaches peak of 8.16 t/s at just 2 threads compared
to 7.95 t/s @ 4 threads before.
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (NEON)
PP-512 is slightly better (138 t/s vs 132.5 t/s), TG-128 is about the
same.
* FA: repack Q8_0 to Q8_0_R8
* Remove special purpose mul_mat_q8_0_r4_q8_1_128 (Zen4)
* FA: repack Q8_0 to Q8_0_R8 (NEON)
Very slightly faster than the general purpose gemm, slightly
slower than the D = 128 special case gemm mul_mat_q8_0_r4_q8_0_128.
Still removing mul_mat_q8_0_r4_q8_0_128 as we simply don't have
enough vector registers to hold 8 interleaved rows, so there is
no point to have the special purpose implementation.
* q4_0_r8 (AVX2)
* q4_0_r8 (NEON)
Tiny bit faster PP (~128 vs ~126 t/s), same TG.
* q4_0_r8 (Zen4)
Somehow only marginally faster?
268 t/s vs 261 t/s
* q4_0_r8 (Zen4) - slightly better
282 t/s for a pure q4_0 L3-8B quantization.
* Apply platform specific modifications when repacking
E.g., on NEON it is useful to pre-apply q ^ 0x88 to q4_0.
This results in a ~3% performance improvement.
Hence,
* Changed the signature of the repack_X functions to take a
bool argument indicating if the repacking is done online and,
if so, apply modifications as appropriate while repacking.
* Added iqk_modify_tensor to apply modifications to models that
have already been repacked while loading the model. Caveat:
just like rtr, this needs to have mmap disabled (else one would
need to move the data to a not mmap-ed buffer, so much more
complicated).
* Apply platform specific modifications when repacking
On Zen4 we can pre-convert the signed quants in q8_0_r4 and
q8_k_r8 to unsigned thus avoiding these operations in matrix
multiplications. With this change we hit
PP-512 = 382.40 t/s (q8_k_r8)
PP-512 = 306.92 t/s (q8_0_r4)
for L3-8B on a Ryzen-7950X using q8_0 KV-cache.
* Process up to 16 columns per kernel call for q8_k_r8
This brings PP-512 up to 389 t/s.
* Be able to load Deepseek-v2-Lite
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Try interleaving 8 rows for iq4_xs
On Zen4, PP-512 goes up from ~260 t/s to 288 t/s for L3-8B.
TG-128 reaches max. performance at 2 threads and is slightly
higher than 4 interleaved rows (14.48 t/s vs 13.11 t/s @ 2 threads
and 14/28 t/s @ 4 threads).
* Try interleaving 8 iq4_xs rows
It is also faster on AVX2.
This is the NEON implementation. It is tiny bit faster than
4 interleaved rows (~0.5%).
So, this looks like a winner given the Zen4/AVX2 improvement
without associated NEON egression.
* Cleanup
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (AVX2)
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (Zen4)
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (Zen4) - slightly better
PP-512 is now 284 t/s compared to 257 t/s for 4-rows interleaved.
TG-128 reaches peak of 8.16 t/s at just 2 threads compared
to 7.95 t/s @ 4 threads before.
* 8-rows interleaved q8_0 (NEON)
PP-512 is slightly better (138 t/s vs 132.5 t/s), TG-128 is about the
same.
* FA: repack Q8_0 to Q8_0_R8
* Remove special purpose mul_mat_q8_0_r4_q8_1_128 (Zen4)
* FA: repack Q8_0 to Q8_0_R8 (NEON)
Very slightly faster than the general purpose gemm, slightly
slower than the D = 128 special case gemm mul_mat_q8_0_r4_q8_0_128.
Still removing mul_mat_q8_0_r4_q8_0_128 as we simply don't have
enough vector registers to hold 8 interleaved rows, so there is
no point to have the special purpose implementation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Add Falcon3 pre-tokinizer (same as llama3)
* q8_k16: use integer arithmetic to sum row values
The existing implementation that just sums up the f32 quantizations
works fine for the original BitNet models and also for the TriLM
ternary models. But for Falcon3 I see a significant difference between
the CPU and the GPU perplexity. If I use the q8_K16 int8_t quants to sum
up the values in a row, then the CPU-GPU PPL difference becomes much
smaller, and we get a lower PPL than Microsoft BitNet, which claims
to be "losless".
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq3_xxs_r4: 1st shot on Zen4
PP-512: 107 t/s -> 137 t/s
TG-128(1 thread): 2.64 t/s -> 3.44 t/s
* iq4_xxs_r4: WIP
* iq4_xxs_r4: 1st shot at AVX2
Note: there is a bug in the AVX2 implementation for nrc_y = 1
for IQ quants with blocks of 32. I have fixed it for now by
using the nrc_y > 1 implementation (which works) also for nrc_y = 1.
* iq3_xxs_r4: NEON
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq5_k_r4: Zen4
Much slower than the others.
* iq5_k_r5: WIP
* Minor
* iq5_k_r4: fix AVX2 nrc_y = 1 case
* iq5_k_r4: better Zen4
But TG is still slower than iq5_k
* iq5_k_r4: slightly better AVX2
* iq5_k_r4: NEON
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Be able to repack tensors at run time
* Repack: also add bf16 as repackable type
* Repack: make sure number of rows is a multiple of the packing
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Not working bf16_r4
* Adding bf16_r8
Small performance gain compared to bf16 - 258 t/s vs 234 t/s.
I guess, this is still sub-obtimal.
* bf16_rx: Very slightly faster by interleaving 16 rows
258 t/s -> 263 t/s
* Rename bf16_r4 to bf16_r16
We are interleaving 16 rows now.
* Cleanup unused stuff
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* q8_k_r8: fastest matrix multiplication known to human kind
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 370 t/s on a Ryzen-7950X!
* q8_k_r8: AVX2
I was worried that we don't have enough vector registrers on
AVX2, but it looks like it handles it just fine. We get
PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 354 t/s on a Ryzen-5975WX.
Slightly slower than the Zen4 version with double the threads,
but still a huge upgrade compared to Q8_0_R4.
* q8_k_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 159.2 t/s.
Compare this to the 128 t/s we have fr Q8_0_R4.
* q8_k_r4: go to signed ints
Why?
* On AVX2 _mm256_maddubs_epi16() may overflow, so we need to
stay within the signed int range and use _mm256_sign_epi8.
Not yet tested on the AVX2 comp, vut expect major slowdown.
* It is almost 10% faster on ARM_NEON. Somehow the veorrq_u8()
needed tto convert from unsigned to signed seems to be extremely
slow on the M2-Max
* We only lose ~0.5% in oerformance on Zen4 (there the exclusive
or that we now use to convert fro signed to unsigned seems to be
much faster than on M2-Max)
* Shutup useless compiler warnings
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq4_k_r4: WIP
* iq4_k_r4: Zen4 and hopefully AVX2
On Zen4 we get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 232.6 t/s, up from 182.2 t/s
for iq4_k. Applying the extra shift costs a ~6 performance penalty.
* iq4_k_r4: AVX2
PP-512 = 227.60 t/s. The shifts are really costly.
* iq4_k_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 108 t/s, up from 58.2 t/s for iq4_k.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* q2_k_r4: Zen4
PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 256 t/s
* q3_k_r4: AVX2
* q2_k_r4: AVX2
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 287 t/s.
Also cherry-picked the q3_k_r4 AVX2 adaptation that I somehow
forgot to push upstream.
* q2_k_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 106.2 t/s.
TG-128 is 36.02 t/s, which is ~10% higher than q2_K_S.
* Make sure rows per thread are a multiple of 4
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* q3_k_r4: Zen4 works, but not as good as it should be
238 t/s, so sloghtly slower than q6_k_r4.
* q3_k_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 106.9 t/s.
This is 1.93X faster than q3_K_S!
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding q6_k_r4
* q6_k_r4: 1st functional AVX2 version
* q6_k_r4: AVX2 and simple Zen4
"Simple" as in processing 4 instead of 8 rows at once.
On Zen4 we get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 238.3 t/s vs
195.2 t/s for Q6_K. TG-128 @ 1 thread is 7.94 t/s
vs 5.38 t/s for Q6_K.
* q6_k_r4: 1st NEON version
PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 78 t/s vs 57.6 t/s for q6_K.
TG-128 is slightly lower rthan q6_K for low number of threads,
becomes very slightly better at 8 threads.
* q6_k_r4: slightly faster NEON
PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 83.25 t/s
* q6_k_r4: slightly faster Zen4
238.3 t/s -> 243.2 t/s
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Something is still wrong
* Simply don't see what is wrong
* q4_k_r4: finally works on Zen4
I had forgotten to prevent token_embd.weight being quantized
with q4_k_r4!
* q4_k_r4: AVX2
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 267 t/s on a Ryzen-5975WX.
This is ~30% better than Q4_K_S.
* q4_k_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 110 t/s.
Not quite as good as q4_0_r4, but still a massive
improvement compared to he 69 t/s for q4_K.
* q4_k_r4: slightly better AVX2
PP-512 goes from 267 t/s to 282 t/s on Ryzen-5975WX
* Minor
* Minor
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* q4_0_r4: 6% faster PP on NEON
* qx_0_r4_q8_0 template
Applied to q4_0_r4 and q5_0_r4. It makes q5_0_r4 PP
~7% faster.
* Apply qx_0_r4_q8_0 template also to q6_0_r4 and iq4_nl_x4
* Simplify
* Minor iq4_xs_r4 improvement on NEON
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding iq2_bn_r4
This Zen4-only implementation achieves PP-512 = 826 t/s (!!!)
for Bitnet-1.58b-3B, up from 620 t/s for iq2_bn.
* Make sure rows per thread are a multiple of the number of interleaved rows
With this I can run iq2_bn_r4 with 32 threads and this increases
PP-512 to 872 t/s.
* iq2_bn_r4: 1st shot at NEON
PP-512 is already faster than iq2_bn (284 t/s vs 246 t/s
for Bitnet-1.58b-3B). TG-128 is ~5% slower.
* iq2_bn_r4: NEON
PP-512 is now 296 t/s. TG-128 is ~20% faster than iq2_bn
for 1 thread, but saturates to about the same 93 t/s at
8 threads.
* iq2_bn_r4: Experimenting on NEON
The matrix x vvector multiplication is erratic.
iq2_bn_r4 is faster at 1, 2, and 4 threads, but
saturates to a lower t/s at 8 threads compared to
iq2_bn. iq2_bn actually manages 99 t/s at 8 threads
and not 93 as I wrore in the last commit. iq2_bn_r4
performance has huge fluctuations at 4 and 8 threads.
* Some cleanup
* iq2_bn_r4: AVX2
As expected, PP is slightly slower as we just don;t have
enough vector registers (690 vs 710 t/s). TG is slightly faster
(18.2 vs 16.7 t/s at 1 thread).
* iq2_bn_r4: use AVX2 implementation on Zen4 for matrix x vector
It is faster - we get 29.6 t/s at 1 thread vs 25.9 t/s for iq2_bn.
* iq2_bn_r4: simdify q8_K16 quantization (AVX2)
PP-512 becomes 834 t/s and TG-128 now saturates to the same
performance as iq2_bn for 4 threads.
* iq2_bn_r4: simdify q8_K16 quantization (NEON)
PP-512 is now 304.7 t/s, and TG-128 @ 8 threads
very slightly outperforms iq2_bn (100.7 t/s vs 99.6 t/s)
* iq2_bn_r4: fix AVX2 after breaking it two commits ago
* iq2_bn_r4: better AVX2
As we don't have enough vector registers on AVX2, it is better
to do two passes per row needing only half of the accumulator
registers that way.
With this, we now beat iq2_bn PP also on AVX2 by a small margin.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding iq4_xs_r4
This is a 1st working version on Zen4.
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 226 t/s, so 16% slower
than iq4_nl_x4.
* iq4_xs_r4: WIP
* iq4_xs_r4: Use AVX2 version for matrix x vector on Zen4
* iq4_xs_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 115.6 t/s on M2-Max,
up from 68.2 t/s for iq4_xs!
* DRY
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding q6_0_r4
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 257 t/s on a Ryzen-7950X.
* q6_0_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 95 t/s on M2-Max.
In terms of ops, q6_0_r4 is identical to q5_0_r4
except for loading the high bits being
vld1q_u8_x2 instead of vld1q_u8. It is strange that
this can make a 5% difference in performance, especially
considering that this is amortized (re-used) over 8 columns
in the right matrix. Or am I running out of vector registers?
* Fix AVX2
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding q5_0_r4
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 256.7 t/s on a Ryzen-7950X.
We even get TG-128 improvement to 11.7 t/s from 11.1 t/s.
* q5_0_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 99.6 t/s on M2-Max,
up from 71.0 t/s for Q5_0. The difference to mainline llama.cpp
is no longer funny: they get 26.5 t/s for Q5_0.
For TG, we are nor able to fully saturate memory bandwidth
and arrive at 22.1 t/s @ 8 threads. Mainline llama.cpp gets
20.6 t/s for Q5_0.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding q8_0_r4
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 268 t/s on a Ryzen-7950X compared
to 175.6 t/s for Q8_0.
* q8_0_r4: NEON
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 112.6 t/s on M2-Max.
* q8_0_r4: Zen4 matrix-vector specialization
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding iq4_0_r4 - q4_0 repacked
We get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 278 t/s on a Ryzen-7950X CPU,
so ~5-6% faster than iq4_nl_x4.
* q4_0_r4: NEON
Here we get 115.8 t/s, so also ~5% better than iq4_nl_x4.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding iq4_nl_x4
Looks very promising - I get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 230 t/s
on the Ryzen-7950X! This is faster than any other quant and
~40% faster than iq4_nl.
* iq4_nl_x4: getting amazing
This Zen4 variant gets us to PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 263 t/s!
* iq4_nl_x4: AVX2
Here we gain only 25% compared to iq4_nl
* iq4_nl_x4: NEON
On M2-Max we get PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 109.7 t/s, up from
82.4 t/s for iq4_nl.
* iq4_nl_x4: minor NEON improvement and cleanup
This gets us to 110.3 t/s. In comparison,
IQ4_NL_4_4 in mainline llama.cpp achieves 92.3 t/s.
* iq4_nl_x4: NEON specialization for matrix x vector
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* multi_sdd: WIP
* multi_sdd: CPU works
* multi_add: CUDA
* multi_add: simplify
* multi_add: Metal
* Metal: speed up mul_mat_id
For the Granite-1B MoE model PP-512 goes from
156 t/s to 890 t/s, so nearly a 6X speedup!
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
I had forgotten that build_bitnet() does not use the standerd
llm_build_ffn function, so the fused mul-silu didn't get used
for Bitnet when I added it to llm_build_ffn.
This gives us another ~1% speedup for TG-128.
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adapting iq2_bn to work without separate scale tensors
Why? It is becoming burdensome to maintain the special Bitnet
conversion in convert_hf_to_gguf.py, so I thnk it is better
to make iq1_bn and iq2_bn just work with the mainline
conversion script (which does not generate scales).
* Adapting iq1_bn to work without separate scale tensors
* Adapting iq2_bn: CUDA dequantize
* Adapting iq2_bn: CUDA works
* Adapting iq1_bn: CUDA works
* Adapting iq1_bn, iq2_bn: NEON
* Adapting iq1_bn, iq2_bn: Metal
Dequantize works, but there is still something wrong
with the dot products.
* WIP
Absoolutely don't see what is wrong with the iq1_bn and iq2_bn
vector dot product kernels.
* Remove iq1_tn and iq2_tn - Part 1
Now that iq1_bn and iq2_bn have per row scales, there is no
reason to also have iq1_tn and iq2_tn.
* Remove iq1_tn and iq2_tn - Part 2
* Bitnet: use the standard llm_build_kv to build self attention
My main motivation was to enable FA. But FA does not work anyway
because head size is 100 for the Botnet ternary models
(and I had forgotten this little detail).
* Revert "Avoid rebuild of GGML graph for each token (#98)"
This reverts commit f2d315b46f7aacc7df4b86bd8acba387b30e11ca.
As far as I can tell, the commit breaks Metal TG.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Add Granite and GranoteMoE models
* Granite: avoid NaNs on CUDA by scaling Q before K*Q multiplication
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
Introduces caching of GGML graph to avoid unnecessary full rebuild between each token.
KV cache parameters, which change with each token, are updated directly in cached GGML
graph. Can be disabled with GGML_DISABLE_GRAPH_CACHING environment variable.
* attn_q Q4 & attn_v Q6 for Llama 3.1 Q5_K_S
Pattern worth to be tested on more quants and on L3 8B.
PPL 512 = -0.024 for 70b ; - 0.005 for 8b
Size = - 640MiB for 70b ; - 64MiB for 8b
70b Q5_K_S now beats Q5_K_M by -0.012 ppl
I suspect that it goes for L3 as well, which was quite insensitive to attn_q quantization.
* indent
To complement the token_embd.weight and output.weight :
attn_v.weight
attn_k.weight.
attn_q_weight
attn_output.weight
attn_qkv.weight
ffn_gate
ffn_down
ffn_up
* iq4_kss: WIP
* iq4_kss: CUDA dequantize works
So we can run perplexity. Sadly, the result does not look good
on the bpw vs quantization error plot.
* iq4_kss: slightly better quantization
* iq4_kss: another small quantization improvement
* iq4_kss: CUDA works
TG-128 performance is very decent with 131 t/s for LLaMA-3.1-8B.
In comparison, we have 123 t/s for q4_0 and 128 t/s for iq4_ks.
I.e., the reduced model size more than offsets the additional
bit fiddling required for iq4_kss.
* iq4_kss: new bit arrangement - CUDA and Zen4 work
Did not lose performance on CUDA. Zen4 is decent, but not great:
PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 163 t/s.
TG-128 is of course better than other 4-bit quants due to smaller model size.
We get 14.5 t/s @ 8 threads.
* iq4_kss: ARM_NEON. Predictably very slow
* iq4_kss: Metal
PP is not too bad - just 10% slower than q4_0.
But TG is 30% slower, i.e., predictably bad.
* iq4_kss: somewhat faster Metal dot product
45.75 t/s -> 48.75 t/s.
Still 22% slower than q4_0
* iq4_kss: AVX2
Bad, but better than I expected.
PP-512(LLaMA-3.1-8B) = 167 t/s on the Ryzen-5950X.
I.e., with 32 AVX2 threads we get the performance of
16 Zen4 threads.
* iq4_kss: very slightly faster Metal dot product
48.7 t/s -> 49.3 t/s
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq4_k_xxs: basics
* WIP + adding iq3_kl quantization mix
* iq4_xxs: this looks very viable compared to iq4_xs
At the same 4.25 bpw PPL is always better, for some models
significantly better. I'll rename to iq4_ks and keep it.
* iq4_xxs: CUDA dot product
We get TG-128 = 126 t/s for LLaMA-3.1-8B, compared to 123 t/s for q4_0.
* iq4_xxs: scalar CPU dot product
Also fix the breakage I caused with the dedicated work buffer
quantization portion when the multiplication is not done
via iqk_mul_mat.
* iq4_xxs: Zen4
I noticed that iq4_xs is wrong on Zen4 (and possibly AVX2).
Again the same mistake of packing int32_t back to int16_t,
which overflows occasionally (just occasionally, that's why the
result doesn't look completely wrong, so I didn't notice).
* Fix iq4_xs (Zen4)
* iq4_xxs: AVX2
* iq4_xxs: ARM_NEON
* iq4_xxs: Metal
* iq4_xxs: slightly faster TG on Metal
* iq4_xxs: rename to iq4_ks
After all, tt is a smaller variant of iq4_k.
* iq3_kl: use iq4_ks instead of iq4_k/iq4_xs
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding fused y*unary(x) op
* Fused y*unary(x) op: CUDA
* Fused y*unary(x) op: dedicated CPU implementation for silu and gelu
* Fused y*unary(x) op: Metal
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding q6_0 - basics + AVX2/Zen4 working
* Adding q6_0: CUDA dequantize works, but not mmvq
* Adding q6_0: CUDA mmvq works
* Adding q6_0: CUDA cpy, so Q6_0 can be used for KV-cache
* Add q6_0 to CPU flash attention
Disappointing result: for LlaMA-3.2-1B, q6_0 K- and V-cache
gives about the same PPL as q8_0 K-cache and q4_0 V-cache,
while needing the exact same RAM.
I.e., what was the point?
* q6_0: slightly better kv-cache result
Better than q8_0+q4_0, but not as good as q8_0+iq4_nl
* q6_0: works on ARM_NEON
* q6_0: dequantize works on Metal, but not vector dot product
* q6_0: it now works on Metal
Outperforms q5_0 by a significant margin. E.g.
| model | size | params | backend | ngl | threads | test | t/s |
| ------------------------------ | ---------: | ---------: | ---------- | --: | ------: | ------------: | ---------------: |
| llama 8B Q6_0 | 6.08 GiB | 8.03 B | Metal | 100 | 4 | tg128 | 44.02 ± 0.08 |
| llama 8B Q5_0 | 5.21 GiB | 8.03 B | Metal | 100 | 4 | tg128 | 40.13 ± 0.12 |
| llama 8B Q6_0 | 6.08 GiB | 8.03 B | Metal | 100 | 4 | pp512 | 500.55 ± 0.32 |
| llama 8B Q5_0 | 5.21 GiB | 8.03 B | Metal | 100 | 4 | pp512 | 448.02 ± 0.27 |
* q6_0: can now be used for kv-cache on Metal
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
On the CPU I get the exact same PPL with and without FA
using bf16 for kv-cache. But on CUDA the bf16 kv-cache
result is about the same as the fp16 kv-cache CPU result,
so I'm missing some conversion somewhere.
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
In this way we can avoid the Q, K, V copies being made
after multiplication with the QKV tensor in, e.g., Phi-3.5-mini.
This results in a 6-7% speedup of PP-512(Phi-3.5-mini)
on CUDA (RTX-4080)
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding GGML_UNARY_OP_SWIGLU
This commit implements the ggml op and CPU compute
forward. I see ~3-4% speedup of PP-512 for Phi-3.5-mini.
* GGML_UNARY_OP_SWIGLU: CUDA implementation
I observe ~12% speedup for PP-512(Phi-3.5-mini).
* GGML_UNARY_OP_SWIGLU: Metal implementation
We get ~2% speedup for PP-512(Phi-3.5-mini).
* GGML_UNARY_OP_SWIGLU: minor improvement on Metal
* GGML_UNARY_OP_SWIGLU: cleanup
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* POC: per row scale
This is a POC how to work around opinionated ggml to
have scales per row rather than per block.
Only implemened for Zen4 and only for iq2_tn.
* POC per row scale: iq2_tn on NEON
* POC per row scale: iq2_tn on Metal
* Per row scale Metal templates
* iq1_tn: shrink to 1.625 bpw (NEON and Metal)
* POC per row scale: CUDA
* POC per row scale: add CUDA TODOs
There are two places in ggml-cuda.cu left where it is assumed
that type_size * n_per_row / block_size is the way to compute
and handle row sizes. This does not affect simple usage,
but will lead to issues when tensors are split between GPUs.
* Per row scales - CUDA
The only place left where there are unnecessary assumptions being made
is in the Flash Attention code. As we are not using any quants that
use per row scales for quantized KV cache, it should be OK for now.
* Update IQ1_TN and IQ2_TN bpw shown to user
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Some tweaks for i-quants
Improve Gemma2 PPL while reducing size
* Some tweaks for iq2_k and iq3_k
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Adding iq1_tn - 1.6875 bpw for TriLM ternary models
* iq1_tn: NEON
* iq1_tn: faster NEON
* iq2_bn: improve performance on NEON
We now get TG-128 = 100 t/s for Bitnet-3B-1.58b!
* iq1_tn: improve AVX2
PP-512 goes to 533 t/s up from 455.
TG-128 @ 2 threads goes to 16.6 t/s up from 14.2.
However, we seem to have a bottleneck somewhere as
TG saturates at 8 threads.
* iq1_tn: improve Zen4
PP-512 goes to 485 t/s up from 352. With FA we get 545 t/s up from 380.
TG-128 @ 1 thread goes to 12.4 t/s up from 10.4.
However, we seem to have a bottleneck somewhere as
TG saturates at 8 threads.
* iq2_bn: improve on Zen4
We now get PP-512 = 614 t/s up from 542 t/s
* iq2_bn: improve AVX2 implementation
We now get PP-512 = 753 t/s up from 680 t/s.
* Remove unnecessary barrier in ggml_compute_forward_mul_mat
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* soft_cap_max: initial CPU version of fused softcap + soft_max
With this vanilla CPU implementation I'm already getting a ~3% speedup
for Gemma-2-9b and a prompt of 8192 tokens.
* soft_cap_max: WIP - something is wrong with CUDA
* soft_cap_max: looks good on CPU and CUDA
* Add softcap to flash attention
Just CPU and CUDA for now (but, as we know, flash attention
on the CPU is useless in llama.cpp).
On CUDA this improves PP performance quite a bit, especially for
long contexts. E.g., for PP-16384, I now get 3777 t/s.
Without this change, one cannot use FA, and one gets 2300 t/s
(after fusing softcap and softmax), or 2000 t/s without the
fused softcap+softmax.
In comparison, mainline llama.cpp has PP-16384 = 1549 t/s before
PR-8542 (where Johannes Gaessler has also added softcap to FA),
and PP-16384 = 3097 t/s after this PR.
* soft_cap_max: Metal
* Flash attention with softcap: Metal
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Softcap: WIP
Fuses scale + tanh + scale as used for softcaping in some
models.
Just CPU for now. ~1.4% for PP-512 on Gemma2-9b, no effect on TG.
Somewhat surprisingly the improvement does not increase as I
go to longer contexts. Gemma2 does softcap on K*Q, which grows
quadratically with context length, so I would have thought
the benefit from fusing scale, tanh, scale would increase.
But no, no luck.
* softcap: CUDA
* softcap: CUDA
~1% speedup for Gemma2-9b
* softcap: Metal and NEON
About 1% speedup.
* Simdified gelu
Gives ~1% speedup for Gemma2-9b prompt processing on AVX512/AVX2.
It looks like the gelu operation is memory bound on my CPU's
after SIMD-ifying it. By not using the 128 kb gelu lookup table
we gain a small advantage.
On the M2-Max the lookup table is slightly faster than the SIMD
version, so left the lookup table for ARM_NEON.
* softcap, tanh: avoid NaNs for large arguments (AVX2, AVX512)
Not that I have encountered this in practice, but just to be sure.
This does it for AVX512 and AVX2, still need a guard for ARM_NEON.
* llama-bench: add ability to turn off warmup runs
So we don't need to wait forever on, e.g., benchmarks involving
long contexts.
* softcap, tanh: avoid NaNs for large arguments (NEON)
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
For LLaMA-3.1 models:
* It is better to quantize all of attn_v with iq3_k instead of
half of attn_v with iq4_k
* Quantizing attn_output with iq3_k results in a larger PPL decrease
compared to what one expects from the added bpw.
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq2_tn: TriLM specific 2.0625 bpw quantization
Quantize/dequantize/scale dot product.
I get 46 t/s for the TriLM-3.9B with any SIMD!
Finally a compiler doing a decent job auto-vectorizing the
scalar implementation.
* iq2_tn: AVX512
Just reusing the k-quants template gets us to PP-512 = 376 t/s,
TG-128 = 47.6 t/s for TriLM-3.9B.
* iq2_tn: AVX512
With this tweak we get to PP-512 = 431 t/s.
* iq2_tn: AVX512
With this tweak we get TG-128 = 19.58 / 35.18 t/s for 1 / 2 threads.
At 4 threads we saturate at 48.41 t/s, and then performance slowly
degrades with increasing number of threads.
* iq2_tn: AVX2
PP512 = 440 t/s on the Ryzen-5975WX.
We should be able to do better.
* iq2_tn: initial NEON version
* iq2_tn: NEON
For TriLM-3.9B running on the M2-Max we get PP-512 = 193.5 t/s,
TG-128 = 75.5 t/s. This is in line with what we have for
iq2_bn ant 3.3B Bitnet.
* iq2_tn: Metal
For TriLM-3.9B on a 30-core M2-Max we get PP-512 = 890 t/s,
TG-128 = 98.5 t/s.
* iq2_tn: CUDA
For TriLM-3.9B running on RTX-4080 we get PP-512 = 9936 t/s,
TG-128 = 299.2 t/s.
* iq2_tn: AVX2 PP improvement
We now get PP-512 = 490.73 t/s for TriLM-3.9B on the Ryzen-5975WX.
We have PP-512 = 636.61 t/s for Bintnet-3B quantized with iq2_bn.
Bintnet-3B is actually 3.4B, TriLM-3.9B is 3.99B, so we would
expect 3.43/3.99 * 636 = 546 t/s, so it seems we still have something
that is not quite optimal in iq2_tn.
* iq2_tn: small NEON improvement
For TriLM-3.9B we now get PP-512 = 206.6 t/s and TG-128 = 76.4 t/s.
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* iq4_k: basics
* quantize/dequantize works
* CUDA dequantize works and one can run PPL calcs. I get
PPL = 6.5258 for LlaMA-3.1-8B, which is 1.77% above fp16.
In comparison, q4_K_S (same size) is 2.88% above fp16.
* TG on CUDA does not work. Johannes has changed the way i-quant dot
products are done, so need to sort out what he had in mind
* iqk_mul_mat is not implemented.
* iq4_k: TG now works on CUDA
* iq4_k: AVX512 implementation
For LLaMA-3.1-8B we get PP-512 = 182.6 t/s, TG-128 = 13.6 t/s,
so almost the same as q4_K_S.
* iq4_k: AVX2 implementation
For LLaMA-3.1-8B we get PP-512 = 203.1 t/s, TG-128 = 12.9 t/s
on the Ryzen-5975X.
* iq4_k: NEON implementation
For LLaMA-3.1-8B we get PP-512 = 60.7 t/s, TG-128 = 25.0 t/s
on the M2-Max. TG is on par with q4_K_S, PP is ~10% slower.
* iq4_k: Metal implementation
For LLaMA-3.1-8B we get PP-512 = 445 t/s, TG-128 = 46.3 t/s
on a 30-core M2-Max GPU. This is to be compared with (currently)
PP-512 = 460 t/s, TG-128 = 51 t/s for q4_K_S.
* iq4_k: scalar dot product
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
* Merging mainline - WIP
* Merging mainline - WIP
AVX2 and CUDA appear to work.
CUDA performance seems slightly (~1-2%) lower as it is so often
the case with llama.cpp/ggml after some "improvements" have been made.
* Merging mainline - fix Metal
* Remove check
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
Kawrakow
saood06
Nexes the Elder
agray3
Kawrakow